Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Local authorities could take powers from failing CCGs

  • Comment

Clinical commissioning groups failing for more than a year could have their responsibilities removed and handed to other organisations, new guidance indicates.

  • Guidance says CCGs could have some of their responsibilities passed to other organisations if they are failing following special measures
  • Follows comments by Simon Stevens saying councils or providers could have greater role
  • Directions issued against three struggling CCGs
  • CCG scorecard to be introduced for 2016-17

375_lgc_hsj_reporting

NHS England chief executive Simon Stevens told LGC’s sister title Health Service Journal in June that struggling groups could have their powers given to other CCGs, local authorities or providers; but there has so far been no mechanism for this.

Guidance on CCG assurance and CCG special measures distributed by the national organisation last week appears to partly formalise such an approach, HSJ reports.

NHS England also last week used its intervention powers against three more CCGs.

The document explaining how special measures can be used for CCGs in future says the regime will be “applied to a CCG facing persistent performance, financial or governance problems where it cannot demonstrate the leadership capability and capacity to deliver improvement on its own”.

NHS England will closely oversee and work with the CCG for a year after imposing special measures. They can then be removed if the CCG has sufficiently improved or the measures extended for a short time.

Simon Stevens

NHS England is going to be ‘more vigorous’ with struggling CCGs, Simon Stevens said

However, where CCGs have “not made expected progress” after the year, the national organisation can “trigger changes in the management, governance or structure of the CCG’s responsibilities, with the potential for other CCGs or relevant bodies to take over aspects of the local commissioner’s responsibilities”.

Mr Stevens said in June NHS England would be “more vigorous” with CCGs with serious problems and that, in addition to replacing senior leaders, it could pass their responsibilities to other CCGs, local authorities or “an integrated provider”.

Although the law allows NHS England to take control of CCGs itself or pass their responsibilities to other CCGs, it is not clear whether it has the legal powers to transfer them to councils or providers. NHS England has not yet placed any groups in special measures.

However, during 2015-16 it has used its powers of legal direction – which are also employed for those with severe problems – against four CCGs. Directions were issued this week for Northern, Eastern and Western Devon CCG, Surrey Downs CCG and Enfield CCG, and in May for Bedfordshire CCG. Directions put on Barnet CCG last year have been lifted in recent weeks.

The 2015-16 assurance framework will see CCGs rated for the first time as “outstanding”, “good”, “limited assurance” or “not assured”, but results will not be issued until after the financial year.

A CCG assurance operating manual, also sent to groups this week, indicates a new “scorecard”, rating them using quality indicators and judgments on capability, will not be introduced until 2016-17.

The health secretary has asked for the new rating system to be developed and results published on the MyHealth website. The approach was questioned before the general election by some commissioning leaders.

Jeremy Hunt has since asked King’s Fund chief executive Chris Ham to work on it with NHS England. The operating manual says: “A CCG scorecard will be developed during 2015-16 for publication as part of MyNHS. This will provide a clear, common information source for assurance from 2016-17.”

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.