Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

NHS trusts overturn Lancashire's £100m Virgin Care contract

  • Comment

A High Court judge has today overturned a local authority’s contract with Virgin Care for public health services after a successful legal challenge by two NHS trusts, Health Service Journal reports.

375_lgc_hsj_reporting

375_lgc_hsj_reporting

Lancashire Care and Blackpool Teaching Hospitals foundation trusts took Lancashire CC to court after the council awarded a five-year £104m contract for school nursing and health visiting services to Virgin Care.

The two trusts were the incumbent providers of the services. 

The trusts claimed the council had failed to apply the scoring criteria correctly, and that other errors and deficiencies occurred during the bid evaluation process.

In their arguments the trusts said they would lose up to £2m of transformation funding and 160 staff as a result of missing out on the contract. 

Mr Justice Stuart-Smith upheld the trust’s challenge, which means the council cannot award the contract to Virgin Care.

In his ruling he found the county council’s records of its moderation process fell short of the standards required to evidence the reasons for the scores awarded to bidders.

HSJ has asked both trusts and the council what they spent in legal fees in relation to the case. 

Shaun Turner (Con), the council’s cabinet member for health and wellbeing, said the council was “disappointed” with the outcome.

“Putting services out to the market is not a political decision, it is simply part of what the county council is required to do in order to meet its legal obligations,” he said.

“Although we’re disappointed in the outcome of this judgement, we are reassured with the exception of the moderation element the county council’s procurement processes was appropriate and that individual panel members were not found to be at fault.

“However, following this judgement, we accept that we cannot award the contract at this time.”

Cllr Turner said the council will not be re-running the procurement or inviting new bids because it was only the moderation process that was deemed to be flawed.

The council is considering its next steps. The services in question have been run on an interim basis by the two trusts since the contract expired in April, and will continue to do so until March 2019.

A spokeswoman for the trusts said they had been “reluctant” to take legal action against another public body, but the court’s decision had “borne out our concerns” with the process carried out by the council.

“We believe the connectivity with other wider NHS services is important in terms of being able to fully meet the needs of the children and families who access these types of services in a joined-up way,” she said.

“We hope to engage with the council about the future of the service.”

Virgin Care did not comment.

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.