Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Revamped wellbeing boards 'should commission health and care'

  • 1 Comment

A new form of health and wellbeing board – containing greater clinical representation – should be put in charge of commissioning health and care services, the chair of a major commission into service integration has said.

Kate Barker, chair of the independent commission on the future of health and social care set up by the King’s Fund, outlined her approach in an interview with LGC to mark the launch of its final report.

A New Settlement for Health and Social Care called for a major expansion of free social care, and for councils’ care budgets to be pooled with NHS cash and ringfenced.

It stopped short of saying which organisation should commission services from the pooled budget, but it suggested a version of health and wellbeing boards could in future carry out this role.

Ms Barker (pictured), an economist and former member of the Bank of England’s monetary policy committee, told LGC: “My sense is that the health and wellbeing boards are going to have to grow into the sort of body that can do it.

“We don’t think health and wellbeing boards as they’re structured today would be right for doing the commissioning because of the need for greater clinical expertise.”  

Kate Barker

However, she added, reshaped health and wellbeing boards, with more clinicians serving on them, could be the new commissioners.  

The commission said everyone with “critical” or “substantial” care needs should receive social care free at the point of need, in line with NHS healthcare.

Free care for those with “critical” needs should be introduced immediately, and free care for those with “substantial” needs should be rolled out “as the economy improves”, the report said.

It said councils’ care budgets should be pooled with a significant proportion of NHS spending as well as the Department for Work & Pensions’ budget for attendance allowance, a benefit paid to those with disabilities.

Making critical care free, as a first step, would initially cost “substantially less than £3bn a year”, the report said.

Making care free for those with substantial and critical needs would cost about £3bn initially and £14bn by 2025, it said, the latter figure being £5bn more than currently projected expenditure related to such needs.

This would be funded with a series of measures, including increases in national insurance, changes to the prescription charge and the restriction of winter fuel payments and free TV licences to the poorest pensioners.

 

  • 1 Comment

Readers' comments (1)

  • Why not have a synthesis of HWB and CCG's with small changes to align CCG's with HWB host catchments. Make the resulting body more arms length from the host council so that they cease to be 'just another committee' of the council and also facilitate the commissioning of primary care with little inherent conflicts of interest present in CCG's dominated by GP's?

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.