Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Three CCGs issued with legal directions

  • Comment

Three clinical commissioning groups have been legally directed by the NHS Commissioning Board because of problems detected in authorisation.

Health reporting HSJ and LGC logo

The board announced the outcomes of the second wave of CCG authorisations on Tuesday. Nineteen of the 67 tested were authorised with no conditions.

However, the board decided that for three which had a large number of conditions and more serious problems it needed to make legal directions.

The directions for each CCG vary but for each of them the board will “insert or provide [a] specific team or individual” as “support”. A spokesman for the board said this did not mean they would be ordered to take on any staff or board members. Instead, they will have to work with the board’s own staff “providing intensive support” to them.

The CCGs and main legal directions are:

  • Nene CCG, which covers most of Northamptonshire, must hand responsibility for commissioning for Kettering General Hospital Foundation Trust to nearby NHS Corby CCG. The commissioning board will oversee Nene’s contracting with Northampton General Hospital Trust and sign off its contract.
  • Medway CCG’s financial plan will be “oversee[n] and supervise[d]” by the commissioning board.
  • Herts Valleys CCG must seek the commissioning board’s approval of a new accountable officer appointment.

So far, across wave one and two CCG authorisations, the north of England region has the largest proportion of its CCGs authorised, while the south has the largest number of conditions on CCGs’ authorisation.

The largest number of conditions relate to CCGs not having “clear and credible” finance and service plans. It is understood many of these have been put in place because CCGs only received planning guidance last month, so were not able to plan in detail.

The next most common issue for conditions is CCGs’ constitutional and governance arrangements – including requirements to be demonstrate “best practice in relation to safeguarding” and “effective system of internal controls”.

Authorisation so far: Waves one and two

 

 Total CCGsProportion of CCGs authorisedNumber of conditions
London3244%29
Midlands and East6143%98
North6856%73
South5046%128

 

Which areas are weak? 
Authorisation domainNumber of conditions
Clear and credible finance and service plans115
Constitutional and governance arrangements73
Engagement with patients, carers and communities33
Great leaders26
Strong clinical and multi-professional focus25
Collaborative plans and commissioning support24
  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.