Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

White paper judicial review rejected

  • Comment

Unison has lost its High Court bid to force the government to consult more widely and thoroughly on proposed changes to the health service.

The union had requested a judicial review to try to stop the government going ahead with its reforms, claiming the Department of Health had failed to properly involve patients, staff and other interested parties in the radical plans contained in the health white paper.

The union had argued that the white paper should have consulted on whether the reforms should go ahead, and not just how they should be introduced.

It also claimed senior NHS officials, including chief executive Sir David Nicholson, had told trust managers to begin implementing the reforms - especialy those concerning GP led commissioning - before the end of the consultation process.

Despite praising Unison for raising the issue, Justice Mitting ruled that the court could not place a legal demand on the government to consult on the proposals.

Unison head of health Karen Jennings said: “Today’s decision is disappointing, but the fight for the future of our NHS won’t stop at the door to the court.

“The judicial review has exposed the charade of government claims that it wants to empower patients, the public and staff over how the NHS is run.

“The government said in the white paper – ‘no decision about me, without me’ - but when it comes to influencing the future of our NHS, clearly they think they can do without us all.  The secretary of state cannot say that he has consulted on the white paper - the damaging ideas in it are all his own.”

Article from our sister title HSJ

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.