Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Council tenants may be forced to downsize

  • 3 Comments

Council house tenants in properties bigger than they need could be forced to move into smaller accommodation under the government’s austerity drive.

Ministers vowed to make the “absurd” housing benefit system fairer, with housing swaps potentially affecting hundreds of thousands of people.

A total of 234,000 households in the social tenant sector are overcrowded while 456,000 are under-occupied, meaning people have more than one extra spare room, according to official figures.

Welfare reform minister Lord Freud (Con) said: “We cannot continue with this absurd situation where some of our poorest families have to live in overcrowded conditions while others are subsidised to live in big homes with plenty of spare room.

“It’s not fair on those families struggling to get by and it’s not fair on the taxpayer.

“That’s why, after the benefits free-for-all of the last decade, we are putting fairness back at the heart of the system.”

More than 3m tenants - 70% of housing benefit recipients - live in the social sector at an annual cost of well over £12bn.

A Department of Work and Pensions spokeswoman said: “From April 2013, we will restrict housing benefit for working age tenants in the social rented sector. This will apply where people live in a property that is too large for their needs.

“We will work with local authorities to ensure that the housing is more sensibly allocated and that entitlement to social housing reflects family size.”

The move is likely to prove controversial for older couples who have lived in council houses for decades since their children have left home.

But the spokeswoman added: “Specific policy detail is yet to be agreed but the principle would be that working age housing benefit claimants who are living in a property that is too large for their household size will have their benefit capped.”

Almost one million people will see their housing benefit cut by an average of £12 a week next year, it emerged earlier this week.

  • 3 Comments

Readers' comments (3)

  • This strikes me as being very unfair when people who have bought their homes can continue to live in them as long as they like, without regard to whether they are under-occupied.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • B Hawkins

    Why not cap council tax benefit as well on private properties which would make it fairer. Anyone who can pay their way with regard to their property is unaffected but anyone who needs the state to help out in any way should be limited to an appropriate size property.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Sorry Fiona White but folk who live in the homes that they have bought are not having rent ,for their oversized property, being met by tax payers.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.