Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Legal action against Javid over rejected local plan

  • Comment

Two councils in areas of high housing demand have had their local plans rejected for failing to co-operate with neighbours to find sites for new homes, leading in one case to legal action.

The cases highlight the difficulty of finding sites in the Home Counties for the housebuilding the government is expected to encourage in its imminent housing white paper.

St Albans City DC is seeking a judicial review of communities secretary Sajid Javid’s refusal to endorse its local plan - after one of his planning inspectors rejected it -, while Castle Point BC is considering its position after a planning inspector found it failed to co-operate with adjacent councils on housing land.

Julian Daly (Con), leader of St Albans, said: “The council believes the inspector’s conclusion that we did not meet the duty to co-operate is flawed. We are therefore seeking a judicial review.”

A spokesperson for neighbouring Welwyn Hatfield BC said: “We raised duty to co-operate objections and concerns in our response to the St Albans consultation around the plan’s proposed housing numbers and the impact that could have in Welwyn Hatfield, mainly the potential for increased pressure on our borough to accommodate the shortfall.”

Hertsmere BC’s portfolio holder for planning and localism Harvey Cohen (Con) said he and “a number of other neighbouring authorities” would meet St Albans for talks.

Castle Point’s plan was turned down for proposing only 107 new homes a year over 2011-31, which the council recognised “does not represent objectively assessed need, but reflects the capacity of the borough to accommodate growth”.

Chief executive David Marchant said: “The council takes the view that protecting the green belt is more important than providing new housing and wanted this principle to be tested in public by an inspector.

“Castle Point came to the view that on balance it was impossible to meet objectively assessed housing needs in full without serious harm to interests of acknowledged importance, notably the established open areas of green belt in the borough.”

Neighbours Southend-on-Sea and Basildon BCs are among councils that have objected to this.

The Planning Inspectorate declined to comment.

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.