Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more


  • Comment
NLGN launches incentives demand...
NLGN launches incentives demand

By Jennifer Sprinks

Local government must act now to develop shared services or face cost-cutting measures after the comprehensive spending review, a New Local Government Network report warns.

The NLGN report, The politics of shared services, says the take-up has been slow and limited because many councils 'remain unconvinced'.

NLGN director Chris Leslie said: 'With the Gershonists demanding further efficiency savings, we localists believe pooled activities can occur without sacrificing cherished policies and clear oversight - but councils will need to be smart in how they engage with this.'

He said government should avoid temptation to mandate change and instead give incentives to share services.

Meanwhile, a report by think tank Policy Exchange says that although the current structures are inefficient, a move to conventional unitary status to boost efficiency is also unattractive because it would reduce democratic representation.

No more tiers puts forward a federal-style unitary model for two-tier areas. It says any new unitaries should set up local committees to delegate tasks upwards but retain local accountability.

The report follows LGC's exclusive survey that showed more than half of county councils are considering unitary bids (LGC, 30 November).

Report author Glyn Gaskarth said: 'I think many counties recognise that simply abolishing districts, while it achieves efficiencies, results in a democratic problem. So this [model] is about keeping power as local as possible. The federal model achieves the efficiencies of a unitary model without reducing democratic representation.'

Federal-style unitaries explained

>> One council with a unified officer structure under a chief executive.

>> Local committees would raise precepts for local services.

>> A county committee would set a countywide budget and raise precepts for strategic services.

>> Decisions taken at the county level could be overturned by a majority of local committees.

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.