Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more


  • Comment
A chief executive was unreasonably sacked on the basis of inadequate information and without being told the nature ...
A chief executive was unreasonably sacked on the basis of inadequate information and without being told the nature of the complaints against him, the Accounts Commission for Scotland has concluded.

Nick Reiter was dismissed by Shetland Islands Council in January after spending nearly half his eight month tenure in the job under suspension (LGC, 15 January).

He was paid£103,000 in compensation and expenses - which the commission has concluded was 'based on procedures which were unreasonable and a decision which was not properly informed'.

In a press statement, controller of audit Robert Black said: 'He was never advised what the complaints were and I remain unclear as to their nature. Also, the council made no effort to resolve any problems there were by conciliation and gave Mr Reiter no opportunity to improve his performance.'

Mr Black said by not adhering to the disciplinary procedures the council 'fell short of the procedural standards appropriate to an issue of this importance'.

He said he could not comment further until the commission has considered his report.

The council said members would meet in August to consider what response to make to the commission. 'Much of the report is drafted in terms of the opinion of the controller of audit and clearly matters of judgment and opinion rightly require time for consideration,' it said.

The case prompted Unison and the Convention of Scottish Local Authorities chief executive at the time, Douglas Sinclair, to call for extra protection for chief executives.

Mr Reiter was suspended over allegations that he had misled members about his role in the Westminster homes for votes scandal (LGC, 15 January). An independent adviser told members there was no evidence of misconduct but councillors in Scotland are not required to accept recommendations from an independent adviser. Mr Reiter could not be reached for comment.

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.