Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more


  • Comment
Improvement at Lincolnshire CC has been 'significantly disrupted' by the Speechley fiasco....
Improvement at Lincolnshire CC has been 'significantly disrupted' by the Speechley fiasco.

In its annual audit letter to the council, the commission said publicity surrounding the conviction of former leader Jim Speechley, and subsequent departure of chief executive David Bowles, meant progress had been piecemeal. In particular, it highlighted social care and highways as areas yet to show consistent improvement despite substantial investment.

'The council has strived to make improvements in service delivery, but these have been significantly disrupted by managing the publicity surrounding the trial of the ex-leader, events leading up to the departure of the former chief executive and the subsequent need to find a replacement,' the auditor said. 'As a result progress has been mixed and although overall improvement has occurred, it is inconsistent across services and often balanced by reduced performance in other areas.'

Lincolnshire, which is currently under a caretaker leadership, decided earlier this month not to appoint a new chief executive until after the county elections (LGC, 14 April).

Interim chief executive Jan Didrichsen said the letter had been overtaken by events such as the Housden report into values, standards and behaviour at the council and no longer accurately reflected performance at the council.

'These are significant issues, but the letter relates to events that happened way back in 2003-04,' he said.

Mr Speechley was convicted of misconduct in public office for trying to improperly influence a road alignment to increase the development value of land he owned (LGC, 8 April 2004).

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.