Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more


  • Comment
Commenting on the decision by trade unions to start balloting their workers on strike action over pensions, Local G...
Commenting on the decision by trade unions to start balloting their workers on strike action over pensions, Local Government Association chairman Sandy Bruce-Lockhart said:

'It is deeply disappointing that even before the consultation period is over, and any decisions have been made, the unions have chosen to look at strike action. It is equally frustrating that the unions appear to be breaking a clear agreement with us and the ODPM over the timetable for the long term reform of the Local Government Pension Scheme.

'Local government staff currently retire at 65 compared to the rest of the public sector at 60 and this is the best way forward. The employee staff contribution compared to the employer council tax contributions are currently not balanced and this must be addressed.

'The council taxpayer simply cannot pay more.

'The changes to local government staff pensions are both needed and necessary. Unless action is taken in the very near future, the cost to individual council tax payers and local government because people are living longer will continue to rise.

'The key aspect of these changes is to make sure the pension scheme does not cost the council taxpayer any more money while at the same time making sure that local government continues to be an attractive place to work in.

'People are living longer and unless the current pensions scheme for council staff means that early retirement on full pension is not an economically viable solution for council taxpayers and employers, and not fair to many employees.'

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.