Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

SUPERMARKET WINS LEGAL BATTLE OVER PLANNING INQUIRY

  • Comment
Retailing giants, William Morrison Supermarkets Ltd, have won a victory in their high court battle for the right to...
Retailing giants, William Morrison Supermarkets Ltd, have won a victory in their high court battle for the right to build a 6,500 square metre superstore on the edge of Billingham.

In a decision which was highly critical of deputy prime minister John Prescott, Mr Justice Lightman said there was no evidence he had even considered two major factors in favour of the scheme.

The minister's failure to allow the supermarket chain to comment on representations made after the end of a public inquiry into the proposals - including one made by bitter trade rivals ASDA - was 'quite wrong' and 'inexcusable' he added.

The site planned for the superstore is currently home to part of the Stockton and Billingham Technical College and William Morrison say the project will provide the funds needed to enable to the college to relocate to a central campus.

A planning inspector who presided over a hard-fought public inquiry into the proposals had also accepted there was a 'need' for a new, major convenience store to serve the town.

But Mr Justice Lightman said neither of those factors in favour of William Morrison's proposals had been given the slightest mention in Mr Prescott's decision letter on March 16 1999 in which he refused to grant planning permission.

The judge said: 'The failure to take into account two of the critical factors in the equation in favour of allowing the development in my view renders the decision-making and the decision open to the most serious question.

'I am satisfied that there must have been a real possibility of a different conclusion if the proper exercise had been undertaken.

'I think that the applicant (William Morrison) has suffered serious prejudice on this ground.'

After the close of the public inquiry, Mr Prescott had received further representations from, amongst others, the 'Save Our College Campaign' and supermarket chain, ASDA, who were promoting a rival scheme for a supermarket nearer the town centre.

Mr Justice Lightman said: 'As regards the conduct of the secretary of state in respect of the receipt of further representations and failure to communicate them to the applicant, I consider his conduct quite wrong and his failure to respond to the applicant's letter inexcusable.'

The minister's conduct had been 'calculated to occasion an unnecessary but well justified sense of grievance' on the part of William Morrison Supermarkets, he added.

Mr Prescott's decision was overturned and he will now have to reconsider William Morrison's planning application. There may have to be a second public inquiry.

Stockton on Tees BC has consistently opposed the superstore plans, saying they would harm the 'viability and vitality' of the town centre shopping area.

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.