Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Survey rebuffs earnings link

  • 2 Comments

LGC readers are lukewarm about the suggestion that senior officer reward should be linked to staff earnings, our survey has found.

Westminster City Council chief executive Mike More suggested that the ratio between top salaries and that of other council staff must not become too great.

Of the senior officers who answered our survey, 8% supported a connection. The most popular ratio selected by those in favour was 9-10 times the bottom-grade salary (26%).

One survey respondent argued against the idea, saying that it imposed a false restriction on earnings and too much reliance on a “percentages approach” to pay.

One senior officer said: “Job evaluation has shown there should be a clear progression, but limiting that progression is foolish.”

Another questioned the viability of such an approach when there was a great deal of difference between councils with contracted-out staff: “How would this apply between a council with most of its delivery services outsourced to partners compared with a council that has mostly in-house services, where the circumstances are likely to be very different?”

The most positive opinion expressed was that any link would need to “depend on a number of factors”.

  • 2 Comments

Readers' comments (2)

  • The difference should be no more than four times the minimum and pay rises should be linked so that any pay rises are across the board and the same amount in money terms. The chiefs would then have a proper incentive to save money so they could increase their salaries and everyone would benefit. As it is now the differences are so vast and unsustainable and their is no incentives for executives to do any work or make any savings.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

  • Mike More is correct. Westminster are forward thinking. Westminster is acting poperly including being honest about salaries. Westminster recently published its top managers actual pay. In fact the difference is about 10 times from 20k at the bottom to 200k at the top. Most staff are happy to see the Chief Executive earning a top salary for a very difficult job.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.