Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more


  • Comment
The Institute for Public Policy Research has attacked the government's plans to part-privatise the Tube, reports Th...
The Institute for Public Policy Research has attacked the government's plans to part-privatise the Tube, reports The Independent (p9).

A report by the left-leaning think-tank entitled 'Getting partnerships going' makes clear that the government plan would cost£2.4bn more than Ken Livingstone's plan for a bond issue scheme to finance London Underground.

Written by Stephen Glaister, Rosemary Scanlon and Tony Travers, of the London School of Economics, the report says the public-private partnership would also undermine the whole mayorality.

The study says that the 'PPP option is not self-financing' and would need government subsidy of between£95m and£262m each year for the full 30 years of the contracts. If the same programme could be delivered using bonds, it would cost between£16m and£182m a year in grant funding from Whitehall.

It says: 'The arrangements for the PPP cut across the government's own desire to retun local democracy to London. There is still an opportunity to deliver a cheaper, more democratic alternative.'

Meanwhile, The Daily Telegraph (p35) reports that the government's plans for a PPP look likley to cost about£100m in consultancy fees.

On Monday, at a house of commons select committee hearing into the Tube, environment secretary John Prescott said he had already reported that consultants costs were 'over£40m' and promised a further update next month.

But now insiders believe the final costs will reach£100m. But a spokesman for the DETR said: 'The government and London Transport are very keen to manage costs carefully. That's why we have joint advisers. You have to look at the costs in the context of delivering£12.5bn of investement and clearly we have to get it right.'

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.