Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Thinktank calls for fees freedom

  • 1 Comment

Councils should be free to profit from planning, licensing, parking and building control fees, a thinktank has said.

The New Local Government Network argued that if councils were freed from national regulations on fee levels they could subsidise services under threat from public spending cuts, with means-tested rebates to reduce hardship.

It said regulated fees meant that councils subsidised the property industry by £500 for every planning application last year, and that areas with active night-time economies saw taxpayers pick up the extra costs of licensing enforcement.

The Communities in Charge report said: “Rather than local authorities simply ceasing to provide specific services, citizens should be given the option to pay for that service, if they want to use it, in a fair way.”

Report author Nick Hope said this approach would go beyond Barnet LBC’s controversial ‘easyCouncil’ because residents could be means-tested before paying.

“Barnet has explored some of this but means testing takes account of social justice,” he said. “Charges would be more acceptable to residents if they are seen to be fair.”

Mr Hope said councils might, for example, offer a fortnightly refuse collection but charge extra for a weekly one, or vary planning application fees depending on whether they wished to attract development.

Surpluses could be used to cross-subsidise services, and help councils to manage demand by stimulating or reducing use as required.

Polling for NLGN showed 45% of the public would support new charges for currently free services, and 46% increased charges for those already paid-for. But only 29%would support tax increases to maintain services.

Mr Hope pointed out that deputy prime minister Nick Clegg had called for local government to gain wider freedoms to set charges.

Click here to read a copy of NLGN’s report, Communities in Charge

  • 1 Comment

Related files

Readers' comments (1)

  • It is now three years since the Audit Commission published Positively charged ( and yet its messages for central and local government seem increasingly relevant given the attention charging is receiving in response to public sector funding cuts. NLGN’s report expands on our own recommendations to government to review the restrictions it places on councils’ charging powers – or at least to explain the rationale behind them. But our work also found that central government restrictions on charging are only part of the problem. There are many more local barriers to effective charging over which councils can exert influence. The lack of dialogue with local people about charging - as part of a wider conversation about what services to provide and how to fund them - is one of those. Another is the lack of transparent information, for decision-makers and the public, about the contribution charging makes to the funding of services. More freedom to charge (or to spend the proceeds) may help some councils, but many could benefit simply by using their existing powers better.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.