Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Transparency over salaries

  • 1 Comment

Unable to make much progress on bankers’ remuneration, national politicians and the media are targeting public sector senior pay. But vote-winning talk of capping salaries at £150,000 risks serious implications for the leadership of councils and local public services.

LGC’s exclusive survey quantifies for the first time how senior officers would react. Only a third of chief executives said their career plans would not change.

The rest face a stark choice: 40% would think of abandoning local government; 51% said they might stay put to avoid a pay cut. So: an exodus followed by a static period.

The TaxPayers’ Alliance may rejoice over “fewer senior managers” but residents won’t when services suffer

Emma Maier, editor of LGC

Particularly worrying is that 42% of directors and senior managers said they’d be reluctant to move (why take a promotion and extra stress without a pay rise?) and 60% would consider leaving, adding to fears over succession planning.

The TaxPayers’ Alliance may rejoice over “fewer senior managers”, but residents won’t when services suffer. It would be a mistake to pursue a cap without considering how it could distort the job market and affect public services.

Meanwhile, it is vital for members and senior officers to engage in the debate about an appropriate level of pay and to explain senior roles and council services to residents.

LGC applauds Katherine Kerswell’s courageous approach and backs the position of the Society of Local Authority Chief Executives & Senior Managers on salary transparency and explaining what chief executives do.

  • 1 Comment

Readers' comments (1)

  • Blair mcpherson

    I am not sure it is particularly helpful to know what the top jobs pay since the majority don't realistically aspire to these posts. What we really want to know is what colleagues earn. I know this is a big issue in the private sector where often no body knows what any one earns and managers negotiate individually with their boss for a pay rise. Some one doing the same job as you in the same office can be paid more. Not so in the public sector every one doing the same job gets the same pay. Or so we use to think before Job Evaluation (JE). We now know that despite working for the same organisation the going rate for the same type of post was different in Education to Social Services and different again in Environment. What's more there was a difference across the organisation in holiday entitlement, sick pay and overtime rates. Even the length of the working week was different. This seems a lot more significant to a lot more people that what the chief executive is paid.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.