Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Unison calls for 2.3% pay rise

  • Comment
The largest union force in local government has warned that it will be expecting a pay rise of at least 2.3% for the year from April.

Previously, Unison and its National Joint Council (NJC) partners the GMB and Unite demanded a settlement of at least retail price inflation, without specifying their preferred measure.

But now Unison’s head of local government, Heather Wakefield, has put a figure to the minimum demand, telling LGC nothing less than a deal that keeps pace with other public sector groups would be acceptable.

“We’ll be looking at what settlements have already been agreed in the public sector, and the lowest of those was for 2.3%,” she said.

“We need a settlement at least in line with that, otherwise local government will keep on falling behind the rest of the public sector.”

Ms Wakefield said she believed pay increases of 2% and above were affordable for councils. She claimed that of a dozen authority budgets surveyed by the union, councils had budgeted for at least 2% pay rises, with some setting aside cash for 2.5% increases.

Sarah Messenger, service director at Local Government Employers, said the organisation would be unable to consider next year’s pay settlement until ACAS had issued its binding judgment on this year’s 2.45% offer - expected within the next three weeks.

She added that the funding picture would be “as challenging, if not more challenging” over the next year than it had been over the previous 12 months.

Paul Tilsley (Lib Dem), deputy leader of Birmingham City Council, said that a 2.3% pay demand was “unrealistic and not affordable” and risked stoking resentment among private-sector workers anxious about losing their jobs rather than securing pay rises.

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.