Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more

Unrest increases over burden of CAA

  • 1 Comment

Concern has been raised that the new “light touch” comprehensive area assessment is placing as much regulatory burden on authorities as its predecessor.

Councils are receiving multiple requests for the same information, while the government’s failure to put information national indicator scores on the ‘data hub’ is placing additional pressure on councils, the Local Government Association said.

The LGA is currently conducting a survey of councils about their experiences of CAA.

Programme director Corin Thomson said: “It would be unfair to make a full judgement on CAA until we have had a full year but there is a real concern about burden.

“The most concern is around the use of resources assessment.”

Ms Thomson added that while the process was not necessarily proving more consuming than the comprehensive performance assessment, councils had been expecting a reduction in burden under the new regime.  

Some senior local government officers privately expressed frustration with the whole process rather than just the burden.

One chief executive described how he “exploded” with rage during a recent meeting with his CAA lead, which he said was “gratuitously offensive”. He added: “I have less faith in CAA than I did 12 months ago.”  

Chair of the LGA Improvement Board, David Parsons (Con), said “The key issue for us is whether the assessments are credible - and whether, in the current climate, they provide value for money. At the moment the jury is still out.” 

Councils are currently going through a round of preliminary discussions about their scores over the summer with a final score scheduled for 10 December.

  • 1 Comment

Readers' comments (1)

  • CAA is such a false premise and the problems are on so many levels. One is that the judgement comes from those very people that have caused lots of the performance problems in the first place by creating fear.

    They specify and stipulate what should be measured for years, and then they judged organisations against those measures. The fact they this killed innovation and they were the wrong measures is besides the point. They now come together to push stuff at LA's, adding new tiers of inspection and cost, all on the wrong premise.

    I mean look at the inspection bodies that are involved. If they were chopped I estimate it would save half a billion pounds! Imagine.

    Unsuitable or offensive? Report this comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.