Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more


  • Comment
Evidence of whistleblowing will be the 'touchstone' which proves whether the Nolan committee's report on local gove...
Evidence of whistleblowing will be the 'touchstone' which proves whether the Nolan committee's report on local government has been properly implemented, according to committee member Sir William Utting.

Speaking at last week's Institute of Revenues, Rating and Valuation conference in Torquay, Sir William said much of what the committee was told during its local government inquiry 'didn't convince me that, when the chips were down, [whistleblowing] guarantees would hold'.

He argued that the provision of whistleblowing procedures was 'one area which we don't believe is sufficiently well developed in local government'.

Sir William, formerly the chief inspector of the government's Social Services Inspectorate, said he would wait to see 'whether whistleblowing people will be promoted and credited rather than made to walk the plank'.

He said local government had been left until the last of the Nolan committee's three reports because it was, in some respects, ahead of the field, with its own national code of conduct.

But Sir William said there was still much to be concerned at and 'scarcely anyone had a good word to say about the code in its present form'. He cited the committee's recommendation that local codes should be developed, reflecting a model code, together with a new local government appeals tribunal.

He noted that planning was a 'powerful focus of discontent' and had become associated with 'corruption, incompetence and procrastination'. He said councillors needed to be offered training in planning issues.

Sir William reaffirmed Nolan's opposition to surcharge, calling it an 'archaic penalty' which should be abolished and replaced with an offence of misuse of public office.

Councillors' allowances was one area of local government where the committee had no criticism of the present system, Sir William told delegates. He said that, while any system of allowances was open to abuse - and that some MPs had often falsified their expenses - 'no councillor would seek election to get rich'.

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.