Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more


  • Comment
New VAT rules for local authorities will leave councils with bigger bills and an administrative 'nightmare', tax ex...
New VAT rules for local authorities will leave councils with bigger bills and an administrative 'nightmare', tax experts have warned.

Bill Petty, a senior VAT manager with Ernst & Young, predicted the rule change could cost local government an extra £150 million in VAT.

Under the new Customs and Excise regime, which comes into force from 1 April, each council department will have to separate out VAT exempt and taxable activity and apportion the VAT accordingly.

At present, councils can ignore VAT incurred in providing goods and services that contain an element of tax exempt activity - such as leisure services - as long as it is less than 5% of the total VAT claimed back from Customs in a year.

Mr Petty said: 'In some cases it will be fairly easy to work out, but these days local government finances are complicated by internal charging between departments and this is where the exercise will become arcane and time consuming.

'It is bound to cause extra work and even delay reclaims of VAT and hit council finances. At worst it will actually result in authorities being unable to reclaim certain of their VAT costs.'

He added: 'Council finance departments should start preparing for what could be an administrative nightmare.'

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.