Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more


  • Comment
The district auditor's report criticising Westminster city council's housing policy receives substantial coverage i...
The district auditor's report criticising Westminster city council's housing policy receives substantial coverage in all today's newspapers.

David Weeks, leader of the council until last year, has attacked the basis of the inquiry, the Financial Times reports (p1).

Mr Weeks, who is named in the report and is still a Westminster councillor, is quoted as saying that the district auditor had acted as 'prosecuting council, judge and jury'.

He said the council's housing policy had been approved as legal by Jeremy Sullivan QC, a specialist in local government. The paper also reports Mr Weeks as saying that the district auditor, John Magill, had taken a 'naive and dictatorial view' of council housing policy.

Dame Shirley Porter, leader of the council until 1991 and also named in the report, is out of the country and could not be located. She issued a denial of the report's criticisms through her solicitor, saying that the auditor's provisional view was 'neither correct in law or in fact'. The paper reports the statement as saying: 'A leading firm of accountants have also advised her that Mr Magill's views about alleged losses are equally wrong and misconceived.'

Barry Legg, a former Westminster councillor and MP for Milton Keynes SW since 1992, who is also named in the report, is quoted by the paper as saying: 'I utterly refute any suggestion of impropriety. When the time comes for me to put my case I will be answering in full the matters raised in the report.'

The district auditor's statement yesterday was a heavily edited version of the report's provisional findings; the final report is unlikely to be published for several months. In a heated debate yesterday during prime minister's question time, Labour leader John Smith called the report 'a devastating example of financial corruption and the abuse of power by senior members of the Conservative party.'

Prime minister John Major replied that he would condemn those involved if the allegations were confirmed. However, he said that that people should not be found guilty until they were proved to be.

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.