Your browser is no longer supported

For the best possible experience using our website we recommend you upgrade to a newer version or another browser.

Your browser appears to have cookies disabled. For the best experience of this website, please enable cookies in your browser

We'll assume we have your consent to use cookies, for example so you won't need to log in each time you visit our site.
Learn more


  • Comment
Council tax in the Westminster City Council area - which is currently the lowest in the country - will rise by more...
Council tax in the Westminster City Council area - which is currently the lowest in the country - will rise by more than 80% if proposed changes to the grant distribution system are accepted by ministers.

The changes, put forward by the Association of Metropolitan Authorities, would see council tax payers in Westminster's band D properties paying £535 a year compared with the current £295.

The paper proposes to end the advantage Westminster gains from the high number of visitors and commuters which flood into central London every day.

Under the current system commuters and visitors, who swell the day resident population by more than 80%, are presumed to be as socially and economically deprived as the residents in the borough. This means the unemployment rate is regarded as being the same among commuters as the resident population and that visitors are deemed as living in overcrowded accommodation.

Shadow environment secretary Frank Dobson has made great play of the advantage this gives the Conservative authority, describing it as the 'Westminster racket'.

He calculated that if every local authority received the same help per head of population, 94% would not have to collect council tax at all and eight would be able to pay a refund of £1,000.

The proposals would give a flat-rate figure for each commuter and visitor, so councils across the country would receive the same grant aid per visitor.

Westminster would lose £26 million in grant from the government, but other areas of the capital with a high number of commuters or visitors would also be hit. The City of London would lose £15m, Camden £6m and Kensington and Chelsea £2m.

The proposed changes would see gains for the majority of AMA members and for councils in outer London. 'The report reflects the concerns of many of our members that the present method . . . is flawed,' said AMA finance policy officer, Phil Walker.

Ministers, who have constantly stressed that the grant distribution system should be impartial, will be under pressure to accept the change.

The Association of London Government said it had yet to decide whether to back the changes.

  • Comment

Have your say

You must sign in to make a comment

Please remember that the submission of any material is governed by our Terms and Conditions and by submitting material you confirm your agreement to these Terms and Conditions.

Links may be included in your comments but HTML is not permitted.